Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton emphasized the need for a more robust police intervention in response to the escalating pro-Palestinian protests occurring on college campuses nationwide. As arrests and controversies continue to mount amid the demonstrations against Israel’s military campaign in its conflict with Hamas in Gaza.
During an interview with Jonathan Karl on ABC News’ “This Week,” Senator Cotton expressed his belief that school leaders, who he suggested may have been influenced by political biases, should have immediately called in law enforcement when the protests first began.
“He expressed his disbelief, questioning the inaction of liberal administrators and politicians who failed to promptly deploy police from the very beginning. According to him, this should not have been tolerated even for a moment.”
In the past few weeks, student encampments have emerged on campuses across the country in protest of the war in Gaza and the high number of civilian casualties.
The recent wave of media attention has been ignited by the protests, leading to mixed reactions from school and state officials. While some officials have attempted to engage in negotiations with the demonstrators, they have also emphasized the importance of striking a balance between the right to protest and the well-being of other students. Additionally, there is a collective effort to minimize incidents of violence and hate speech.
At times, law enforcement authorities have intervened to disperse the protesters, as was the case at Columbia University. Several arrests were made when students and other demonstrators occupied the university’s Hamilton Hall.
Several other universities still have intact encampments.
In 2020, Cotton faced criticism for his statement urging the military to intervene and control “looting” and “rioting” amidst the civil unrest. During an appearance on “This Week,” Cotton expressed a negative perspective on the campus movement, referring to the protesters as “fanatics” and likening each encampment to a “little Gaza.”
During the questioning by Karl, Cotton responded by saying, “They refer to themselves as the Gaza solidarity encampments — they’re like miniature versions of Gaza.”
Karl challenged the notion, suggesting that it appeared as though the situation in Gaza was being belittled.
Cotton made it clear that he wasn’t talking about the distressing situation for civilians in Gaza or the fatalities that have occurred. He placed the blame for these on Hamas, the group responsible for initiating the current conflict with Israel following a terrorist attack on October 7th. Cotton specified that his statement was directed at the actions of the protesters, with a significant number of them being students.
“He said they deserved our contempt and mockery.”
Cotton acknowledged that protesting, for the most part, is a protected form of activity. However, he argued that the current state of protests on campuses has crossed a line.
He strongly condemned the incidents of violence and expressed his concern over the presence of “vile, antisemitic hate” in the reports. He specifically mentioned an incident where a George Washington statue was adorned with pro-Palestinian attire at a school.
He emphasized that individuals have the right to express their opinions through protests. However, he made it clear that it is unacceptable to endorse a terrorist organization and engage in actions that violate campus regulations and legal statutes.
Several of the organizations involved in the pro-Palestinian protests have condemned antisemitism and made efforts to separate themselves from any such behavior. They emphasize that such conduct does not align with their objectives or values, which primarily revolve around raising awareness about the civilian casualties in Gaza.
During his interview on “This Week,” Cotton, who advocates for a strong American presence internationally, also stood up for House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., regarding the recent approval of a foreign aid package. The package includes funding for Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine, and this legislation is anticipated to trigger a resolution from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., calling for Johnson’s removal.
According to Cotton, a significant majority of House Republicans expressed their desire to provide support to Ukraine, even if they did not support the particular legislation in question. However, a smaller majority voted in favor of completely cutting off aid. Cotton emphasized that Speaker Johnson has the backing of about two-thirds of the entire Republican conference on this specific issue. Additionally, he highlighted that the majority of Republicans support Johnson’s stance on matters concerning Israel and Taiwan. This statement was made in response to Karl’s observation that most House Republicans voted against the bill.
Cotton dismissed the notion of a more isolationist GOP, stating that the opposition to foreign aid is primarily rooted in discussions about logistics rather than principles.
According to the speaker, many Republicans have valid and justified concerns about the capacity of our defense industrial base to adequately support our own military, let alone other nations’ conflicts. The speaker also shares these concerns and believes that the solution lies in increasing investments in the defense industrial base. This perspective reflects a practical approach that takes into account the specific circumstances within our defense industrial base.
Karl brought up several concerns regarding Donald Trump, the Republican candidate. In response, Cotton downplayed certain disagreements with the former president, including Trump’s refusal to acknowledge that the 2020 election was free from widespread fraud.
Cotton, who does not endorse Trump’s rhetoric, shifted his focus by stating his agreement with Trump on the notion that certain aspects of the 2020 race were “deeply unfair.”
When questioned about the possibility of becoming Trump’s running mate, Cotton dismissed the topic as a mere speculative “parlor game” and avoided giving a direct response.
According to Senator Tom Cotton, the main focus for Donald Trump is to secure victory in the upcoming election. As for Cotton himself, his primary goal is to assist Trump in achieving this victory and ensuring that the Republicans also succeed in winning the Congress. Cotton emphasized that the decision regarding the vice president will be made by Trump when he deems it appropriate.
Karl inquired whether he agreed with Trump’s assertion that the individuals being prosecuted for their alleged involvement in the Capitol Hill riot on January 6, 2021, were truly “hostages.”
Cotton argued that certain individuals who did not partake in any violent acts were unfairly subjected to prolonged pretrial detentions. However, he emphasized that those who were directly involved in the riot, including those who assaulted police officers or vandalized public property, should face the appropriate legal repercussions.
He remarked, “That’s a unique perspective.”
