Hunter Biden asserts that the ‘surprisingly frank admission’ under oath by a Trump White House policy analyst should propel the ‘hacking’ lawsuit forward

Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, has responded to a motion to dismiss his federal “hacking” lawsuit in California. In his response, he highlighted a sworn declaration from a former policy analyst in the Trump White House. Hunter Biden referred to this declaration as a “surprisingly frank admission” that serves as undeniable evidence of the defendants’ unlawful data access. This revelation strengthens his case and solidifies the fact that the defendants violated the law.

Garrett Ziegler, Marco Polo, and 10 Does claimed that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) lawsuit against them is a strategic lawsuit against public participation, which they believe should be dismissed. They argue that the lawsuit aims to suppress their “protected” First Amendment activity. However, Hunter Biden has responded to this by stating that he is suing the defendants because they unlawfully and without authorization accessed his data, not because of their use of the data for speech-related purposes.

Related Coverage:

When it comes to staying informed, having access to related coverage is crucial. Being able to delve deeper into a topic or see different perspectives can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the subject at hand. Whether it’s news articles, opinion pieces, or investigative reports, related coverage adds depth and context to the information being presented.

By including related coverage, readers are given the opportunity to explore a topic further and gain a more well-rounded view of the subject matter. This can be particularly valuable when it comes to complex issues that require multiple viewpoints and extensive research.

In addition, related coverage can help to highlight important connections and correlations between different stories. It can reveal underlying themes or patterns that may not have been immediately apparent. This can lead to a greater understanding of the broader context in which a particular event or issue is taking place.

Read More:  Is It Illegal to Drive Barefoot in Vermont? Here’s What the Law Says

Furthermore, related coverage can provide a platform for diverse voices and perspectives to be heard. It can showcase different cultural, social, and political viewpoints, promoting a more inclusive and balanced dialogue. This is particularly important in a time when media outlets are being criticized for their lack of diversity and representation.

Overall, including related coverage enhances the overall reading experience and contributes to a more informed and engaged audience. It allows readers to go beyond the surface level of a story and explore the various dimensions and implications. By providing access to a range of perspectives and information, related coverage serves as a valuable resource for those seeking a deeper understanding of the world around them.

In the filing, Ziegler’s own sworn testimony was presented as sufficient evidence to withstand the motion to dismiss.

The opposition argues that the defendants have provided a sworn declaration from Ziegler, who, under oath, admits to spending months “locating” the plaintiff’s passwords and subsequently using one or more of those passwords to access the plaintiff’s password-protected data. They quote Ziegler’s admission as evidence of this action.

Also contained on the external hard drive given to me were files containing passcodes, which are essentially similar in function to passwords designed to allow access to password-protected files. Although it took months of examination, we were able to locate the passcode which allowed access to the iPhone backup file. Those files existed on the external hard drive when it was first given to me.

According to Biden’s legal team, the defendants were involved in the exact kind of hacking activity that the laws aim to penalize.

Read More:  Patient who received first pig kidney transplant passes away after almost 2 months

Hunter Biden has agreed to transfer the lawsuit over the alleged “hacking” of his laptop data to the same jurisdiction where Rudy Giuliani practiced law. This decision comes as the bankruptcy case moves forward.

Ziegler, who previously served as associate director in the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy under former Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro, openly boasted about his involvement in accessing Hunter Biden’s iPhone backup and successfully decrypting the encrypted code stored on his laptop. This revelation was made in the filing.

The Biden opposition claims that the Defendants unlawfully accessed the encrypted code stored on the Plaintiff’s laptop and then uploaded it to their website. According to them, this data is still accessible on the website. They also suspect that the data uploaded from the Plaintiff’s encrypted iPhone backup, as well as the data from the Defendants’ copy of the laptop’s hard drive, has been manipulated, tampered with, altered, and/or damaged by the Defendants.

The plaintiff, once again, confidently claims that there is enough evidence to prove Ziegler’s wrongdoing. They firmly believe that Ziegler’s sworn testimony will ultimately have serious consequences for him.

“The available evidence suggests that Defendants somehow obtained Plaintiff’s data, although the exact method is unclear. Once in possession of Plaintiff’s data, Defendants proceeded to access it without Plaintiff’s permission or consent. This unauthorized access included discovering Plaintiff’s password and using it to gain entry into the password-protected data. Plaintiff explicitly demanded that Defendants stop their unlawful activities, but this request was ignored. Defendants have persistently continued to access, tamper with, and manipulate Plaintiff’s data, as confirmed by Defendant Ziegler’s sworn testimony in this case.”

Read More:  Alabama sawmill faces proposed penalties of almost $2.5 million by US Department of Labor

 

Leave a Comment