Oregon Governor Tina Kotek took a decisive step on Monday by signing a bill into law that reinstates the criminalization of possessing small quantities of drugs.
House Bill 4002 will put an end to the groundbreaking drug decriminalization law that was implemented three years ago. According to the Statesman Journal, the new measure is set to take effect in the upcoming fall.
Beginning on September 1st, the new law will overturn Class E violations, which were established by Measure 110. This measure removed criminal penalties for individuals caught with small quantities of illegal drugs. Instead, those found with such substances will now be charged with a “drug enforcement misdemeanor.”
Oregon has made a significant move in the realm of drug policy by scrapping a groundbreaking drug law. This decision has sparked discussions about the implications of decriminalization. With this development, Oregon is sending a clear message about its approach to drug offenses.
The decision to decriminalize drugs in Oregon marks a new era in the state’s drug policy. By eliminating the law that made possession of small amounts of drugs a criminal offense, Oregon has taken a bold step towards addressing drug-related issues in a more progressive manner.
Decriminalization is a policy approach that focuses on treating drug use as a public health issue rather than a criminal one. It aims to shift the focus from punishment to harm reduction and rehabilitation. With this change, individuals caught with small amounts of drugs will no longer face criminal charges or incarceration. Instead, they will be referred to addiction treatment programs and other support services.
The move towards decriminalization in Oregon is not without its critics. Some argue that it may lead to an increase in drug use and related problems. However, proponents of decriminalization point to other countries, such as Portugal, where similar policies have been implemented successfully.
In Portugal, the decriminalization of drugs has led to significant positive outcomes. Drug-related deaths have decreased, HIV infection rates have dropped, and overall drug use has not significantly increased. These results highlight the potential benefits of a more compassionate approach towards drug use.
Oregon’s decision to decriminalize drugs is also grounded in racial justice. The previous drug law disproportionately affected communities of color, leading to significant disparities in arrests and convictions. By decriminalizing drug possession, Oregon aims to address these racial disparities and promote more equitable outcomes.
It’s important to note that decriminalization should not be confused with legalization. Decriminalization removes the criminal penalties associated with drug possession but does not legalize the production or sale of drugs. The production and sale of drugs will still be illegal in Oregon.
In conclusion, Oregon’s decision to scrap its groundbreaking drug law and embrace decriminalization is a significant step forward in drug policy. It signals a shift towards a more compassionate and equitable approach to drug use. While the implications of this decision are still being debated, it is clear that Oregon is leading the way in reevaluating drug policies and exploring alternative solutions to drug-related issues.
What does it mean to decriminalize drugs?
This Article Includes
The American Pharmacists Association’s policy arm endorsed decriminalization as a public health measure last year. Decriminalization refers to the removal of criminal penalties and prison sentences for the simple use and possession of drugs, without legalizing or authorizing them.
According to Bratberg, one of the co-authors of the APhA’s position, a more effective approach to address substance abuse is to decriminalize the possession and use of drugs and to avoid a punitive strategy. He argues that the current drug war has proven to be unsuccessful, and alternative approaches are necessary.
When did Oregon decriminalize drugs?
In 2020, Oregon voters made a significant decision by approving a ballot measure that decriminalized the possession of small quantities of illicit drugs and allocated funds towards treatment and recovery programs. This law took effect in 2021. Measure 110 does not equate to drug legalization; rather, it eliminates prison sentences for drug possession and replaces them with $100 fines. These fines can be waived if individuals contact a dedicated hotline and undergo addiction screening.
Over the years, Measure 110, which was supported by the Drug Policy Alliance, a national organization advocating for drug decriminalization, has successfully prevented the arrests of numerous individuals, according to Kassandra Frederique, the executive director of the organization.
According to Frederique, research consistently indicates a substantial increase in overdose cases among individuals who are incarcerated in jails and prisons. Moreover, the likelihood of overdose deaths significantly rises when these individuals are released from correctional facilities, as compared to the general population.
How will the new law be implemented?
The bill received support from both sides of the aisle as the state witnessed a continued rise in drug overdose deaths. Over the course of four years, from 2019 to the 12-month period ending on June 30, 2023, overdose deaths caused by synthetic opioids surged dramatically, increasing from 84 deaths to over 1,100 in the state.
If a county has a deflection or diversion program and a prosecutor decides to utilize it, the person in question may be placed on probation for a period of 18 months. In the event of a probation violation, they could face a 30-day jail sanction. If the probation is eventually revoked, the maximum jail time that can be imposed is 180 days.
23 out of the 36 counties in Oregon have already signed “letters of commitment” to establish and provide deflection programs as part of HB4002.
Kotek signed the legislation and accompanied it with a letter to Senate President Rob Wagner, D-Lake Oswego, and House Speaker Julie Fahey, D-Eugene. The purpose of the letter was to address any remaining concerns regarding the implementation of the legislation.
In order for the deflection programs and bill to be effective, she emphasized the importance of everyone committing to “deep coordination.”
During the legislative testimony, the Oregon Public Defense Commission emphasized the necessity of hiring 39 more full-time public defenders in order to adequately handle the anticipated influx of cases resulting from the proposed bill. Presently, there are approximately 2,873 individuals in the state who are currently without legal representation.
Oregon Governor Signs Bill Reintroducing Criminal Penalties for Drug Possession: What You Need to Know
In a significant move, Oregon Governor has signed a bill that reintroduces criminal penalties for drug possession. This decision has sparked a lot of debate and discussion among the public. While some view it as a necessary step to address drug-related issues, others are concerned about the potential consequences and impact on individuals struggling with addiction.
The bill, which was signed into law recently, effectively overturns a previous measure that had decriminalized the possession of small amounts of drugs. Under the new law, possession of certain controlled substances, including methamphetamine, heroin, LSD, and oxycodone, will once again be considered a misdemeanor or felony offense, depending on the quantity involved.
Advocates of the bill argue that the previous decriminalization law had unintended consequences, leading to an increase in drug-related crimes and a lack of support for individuals seeking treatment. They believe that by reintroducing criminal penalties, the state can better address the underlying issues associated with drug addiction and provide necessary resources for rehabilitation and support.
However, opponents of the bill express concerns about the impact it will have on marginalized communities and individuals struggling with addiction. They argue that criminalizing drug possession disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income individuals, perpetuating existing disparities in the criminal justice system. They also worry that the focus on punishment rather than treatment may hinder efforts to address the root causes of drug addiction and limit access to vital support services.
It is important to note that the new law includes provisions aimed at diverting individuals with substance use disorders to treatment programs instead of incarceration. The intention behind these provisions is to prioritize rehabilitation and support for individuals struggling with addiction, rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
The implementation of the new law will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications and will require careful monitoring and evaluation. Supporters and opponents alike will be closely watching the impact of these changes on both individuals and communities, with hopes of finding a balanced approach that effectively addresses drug-related issues while also prioritizing compassion and support for those in need.
Read More:
- Ukrainian captain reports that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet in Crimea has one ‘loser’ missile ship remaining, which has yet to launch any missiles
- Michigan congressman attacked for suggesting Gaza should be bombed ‘like Nagasaki and Hiroshima’