According to financial data published by Truth in Accounting, the analysis reveals that the largest cities in Texas with the highest taxpayer burdens are predominantly governed by Democrats.
According to a recent analysis conducted by Truth in Accounting, a comprehensive assessment of the fiscal health of the 75 most populous cities in the U.S. revealed that 70% of them, or 53 cities, faced a financial shortfall and were unable to cover all their expenses. This analysis was based on the examination of the latest annual comprehensive financial reports from 2022.
The majority of debt owed by cities is attributed to pension, healthcare, and post-employment debt, as highlighted in TIA’s eighth annual Financial State of the Cities report.
To demonstrate the effect on taxpayers of budgeting and utilizing taxpayer funds, TIA has devised a method. For cities facing financial shortages to cover their expenses, TIA determines the taxpayer burden by dividing the required revenue by the estimated number of taxpayers. Similarly, in cases where cities have excess funds after meeting their financial obligations, TIA determines the taxpayer surplus by dividing the surplus amount by the estimated number of taxpayers.
The cities were assessed based on their fiscal health, considering factors such as taxpayer burden or surplus, balanced budget requirements, and more.
According to the analysis, only one percent of the 75 cities evaluated received an A grade for fiscal health. The majority of cities received D grades, followed by C and B grades.
None of the cities in Texas were awarded an A grade.
Plano, Corpus Christi, and San Antonio are among the cities that have reported taxpayer surpluses. In fact, Plano had a surplus of $5,100, Corpus Christi had a surplus of $1,500, and San Antonio had a surplus of $900. These cities have managed their finances well, resulting in positive outcomes for their taxpayers.
Plano and Corpus Christi have both secured spots in the top 10 rankings nationwide, with Plano coming in at third place and Corpus Christi at tenth.
Two Texas cities in the ranking, Plano and Fort Worth, are each governed by a Republican administration. Plano boasts a surplus, while Fort Worth faces a deficit.
Dallas has the highest taxpayer burden, with Houston, Fort Worth, Austin, and El Paso following closely behind. It is worth noting that all of these cities, except for Fort Worth, are run by Democrats.
All the cities, except for El Paso, received D grades for fiscal health. However, El Paso managed to secure a C grade.
Texas cities did not make it to the bottom ten in terms of taxpayer burden. However, Dallas, Houston, and Fort Worth ranked among the bottom 20 cities in this regard, with Dallas being the 13th worst, Houston the 15th worst, and Fort Worth the 20th worst.
The taxpayer burden in Dallas was the highest at -$9,600, with Houston following closely behind at -$9,000 and Fort Worth at -$7,400.
Austin has been ranked as the 25th worst city with a taxpayer burden of -$6,400.
According to the report, Plano’s ranking may be misleadingly high due to the absence of up-to-date pension data.
Plano’s pension system stands out from most cities due to its reported unrealized investment gains during a favorable market period. However, the past few years have shown significant volatility in investment market values. This highlights the potential risk taxpayers face when a city provides defined pension benefits to its employees. Despite this, Plano’s pension and retiree healthcare plans have remained well funded.
According to the report, Dallas had to address a $3.7 billion deficit to fulfill its financial obligations, which was a $1.9 billion reduction compared to the previous year.
The 2022 financial report from Dallas reveals that officials relied on pension data from 2021, a period when pension investments were performing strongly. The report acknowledges that if the city had experienced the same significant decrease in pension investments as many other cities did in 2022, Dallas’ pension debt would have been higher. The report underscores the volatility of investment market values in recent years, highlighting the risks borne by taxpayers when their city provides defined pension benefits to its employees.
The report also highlights the impact of various factors on the city’s financial health. These include ongoing market fluctuations, changing investment values, reduced COVID relief funds, and a stabilizing economy that may result in slower tax collections.
In the recent autumn, the mayor of Dallas made a decision to switch political parties from the Democrat Party to the Republican Party, following unsuccessful attempts to persuade the Dallas City Council to reduce spending and decrease taxes.
According to him, the notion that we couldn’t have reduced the budget and lowered taxes without sacrificing essential services is false. He contradicts those who argue for tax increases, stating, “It is absurd to claim that our city government couldn’t provide essential services next year with the same tax revenue collected from Dallas residents and businesses just a year ago, simply by being more efficient.”
The city council, instead of reducing spending, has approved the biggest budget in the history of the city. As a result, property taxes have increased by 8%. Economists caution that any efforts by the legislature to lower property taxes will be nullified by local governments that continue to spend without restraint.
Read More:
- Investigation of a serial murderer uncovers additional unidentified victims
- No Arrest Made in Alabama Shooting Death of Sharmeethia Mason on Her Front Porch in 2021