A ban on nearly all abortions around six weeks after conception in South Carolina can continue to be enforced, according to a state judge’s ruling. The appeal is ongoing to determine the precise definition of a heartbeat under the law.
Planned Parenthood requested that the court invalidate the law while it examines the language used, which includes alternative definitions of when cardiac activity begins. This could potentially result in an extension of the timeframe in which abortions can legally be performed under the 2023 law.
According to the law, abortions are not allowed once an ultrasound can detect the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac, which is also known as cardiac activity.
The current interpretation of the definition suggests that it is approximately six weeks after a person’s last period. However, the subsequent clause after the “or” in the sentence may imply the requirement for the formation of a heart, which medical experts assert typically occurs around nine weeks.
The state Supreme Court acknowledged the existence of various definitions when it upheld the law last year, stating that the resolution of these definitions would be addressed at a later time.
Circuit Judge Daniel Coble emphasized in his recent ruling that the primary consideration for judges when there are differing interpretations of a law is to prioritize the intent of lawmakers.
Legislators, previous court rulings, and even Planned Parenthood have consistently cited a six-week timeframe. This was argued against the first version of the ban, which was ultimately overturned by the state Supreme Court. However, with the appointment of a new justice and some adjustments made to the law, the high court reversed its decision and upheld the second version in August.
According to Judge Coble, there is no legislative history that suggests a time frame other than the six-week mark, let alone nine weeks. He pointed out that lawmakers, including Democrats in the Republican dominated General Assembly, referred to it as a six-week ban in debates on at least 20 occasions.
Coble’s ruling against temporarily suspending the law is not the final decision. Planned Parenthood is anticipated to appeal and contend that the various interpretations of a heartbeat render the law constitutionally vague.
The current situation in South Carolina maintains a ban on abortions after six weeks, with exceptions for cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest, the fetus is unlikely to survive outside the womb, or the mother’s health is in serious danger.
According to court documents filed by Planned Parenthood, within the initial five months of implementing the new law, a significant number of women seeking abortions, specifically three-quarters of them, were denied the procedure due to the advanced stage of their pregnancies. Further analysis revealed that out of the three-quarters, a staggering 86% of women would have been eligible for the abortion if the law permitted the procedure up to nine weeks.
“After Thursday’s ruling, Brandon Charochak, the spokesman for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster, affirmed that the governor will persist in his efforts to safeguard life in South Carolina.”
Coble’s ruling has brought to light further inconsistencies in the language of the law, which could potentially become contentious issues in future appeals. While the law mentions a fetal heartbeat, it is widely recognized among experts that a fertilized egg is considered an embryo for approximately 10 weeks after conception before it develops into a fetus.
Coble explained that the main objective of the court in presenting this argument is to highlight the ambiguity surrounding the definition of ‘fetal heartbeat’. Despite the plaintiffs’ assertion that the definition clearly indicates a nine-week timeframe, Coble emphasized that the definition is not as straightforward as it seems. If the definition were indeed as clear as the plaintiffs suggest, the case would be much more straightforward.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, a nationwide right to abortion has been brought to an end. As a result, Republican-controlled states have taken action by implementing new bans or restrictions on abortion, while Democrat-dominated states have made efforts to safeguard access to abortion.
Abortion bans are currently in effect in 14 states throughout all stages of pregnancy, with limited exceptions. Additionally, South Carolina and two other states have implemented bans that come into effect at or around six weeks into pregnancy.
The lawsuit filed by Taylor Shelton and Planned Parenthood was made possible due to the punctuation in South Carolina’s law, which sets it apart from other six-week bans.
Shelton was shocked to discover that she was pregnant just two days after missing her regularly tracked period, despite seeking medical attention for the pain caused by her intrauterine device.
The uncertainty surrounding the definition of a heartbeat and the potential criminal charges that doctors in South Carolina could face for performing illegal abortions led a woman to travel to North Carolina for her procedure. Despite the inconvenience of driving for hours and attending multiple appointments, she chose to undergo the procedure there as doctors in her home state were unable to provide the clarity she needed.
Shelton expressed her anger and frustration towards a system that aims to control women’s bodies and restrict their choices. She firmly believes that no one should have to go through what she experienced and emphasizes the need for clearer and more definitive laws.
Read More:
- Body is presumed to be missing. Tampa mom found
- Remains discovered in a Wisconsin chimney in 1989 finally identified as missing man who last reached out to family in 1970
