Judge Juan Merchan, in a comprehensive jury instruction, requested jurors to consider Donald Trump as “a fellow member of the community” as they undertake the crucial task of deciding his fate in the hush money criminal trial.
Merchan emphasized that it is not his duty to evaluate the evidence presented. Rather, he firmly stated that the responsibility lies with the judges themselves. As the judges, they hold the crucial task of examining the facts and ultimately determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
The jurors were instructed not to consider Trump’s choice not to testify as evidence against him. They were advised to use their own judgment in assessing the credibility of witnesses who may have been untruthful or biased. This point was emphasized by the defense counsel throughout the trial.
Determining the credibility of a witness is not an exact science, as stated by Merchan. It is important to take into account whether the witness has any vested interest in the outcome of the case, which is another factor that jurors may consider.
In his explanation, Merchan provided guidance to jurors on how they should understand various legal terms used during the trial. He delved into concepts such as “beyond a reasonable doubt,” “unlawful means,” “intent to defraud,” and “motive,” among others.
It is crucial to note that prosecutors are required to establish that the business records were falsified as part of another criminal activity. However, it is not necessary for them to prove that the other crime actually took place.
According to him, if the People are able to prove their case, it is necessary for the defendant to be found guilty.
During the trial, Merchan made it clear to the jury that they should not solely rely on Michael Cohen’s testimony to convict the former president. Merchan pointed out that Cohen is an accomplice to the alleged crime, and therefore his testimony should only be considered if it is supported by corroborating evidence.
According to Merchan, jurors cannot convict the defendant based solely on the testimony of Michael Cohen, even if they find it believable. They must also find corroborating evidence that connects the defendant to the crime.
Merchan’s instructions emphasized the importance of each juror independently evaluating the case and reaching a fair decision. It was made clear that the jurors should not compromise their honest assessment of the evidence, even if it meant prolonging the trial or going against the majority. However, they were also encouraged to remain open-minded and willing to reconsider their views if new evidence or arguments convinced them that their initial position was incorrect.
Jurors paid close attention during the instructions, with many seen taking notes. Trump, in his typical fashion, leaned back in his chair and occasionally closed his eyes. He also fidgeted with papers on his desk intermittently.
Merchan wrapped up his instructions precisely at 11:23 a.m.
Prosecutors claim that Trump fraudulently recorded $130,000 in expenses as legal services for Cohen, as part of an alleged scheme to reimburse his former attorney for payments made to Stormy Daniels, the adult film star.
Trump has maintained his innocence and denied any wrongdoing, pleading not guilty.
Read More:
- Continuing strikes see Israeli tanks advancing to central Rafah
- Judge rejects special counsel’s request to prevent Trump from making statements about law enforcement